India: Government must withdraw the Telecommunications Bill, 2023

India: Government must withdraw the Telecommunications Bill, 2023 - Digital

Photo by Adem EY on Unsplash

ARTICLE 19 joined a global coalition of civil society organisations in signing an open letter urging India’s Department of Telecommunications to withdraw the Telecommunications Bill, 2023. The Bill enables indiscriminate surveillance, undermines encryption, and erodes privacy and safety online. As it stands, the Bill poses grave threats to democracy and fundamental rights and must be withdrawn. Read the full letter below.

To: Shri Ashwini Vaishnaw
Hon’ble Union Cabinet Minister for Railways, Communications, Electronics & Information Technology
Department of Telecommunications
Ministry of Communications
Government of India

Subject: International group of organisations and experts urge the Department of Telecommunications to withdraw the Telecommunications Bill, 2023, and protect fundamental rights.


We, the undersigned organisations and experts, committed to an open, secure, and free internet, urge the Department of Telecommunications to withdraw the Telecommunications Bill, 2023 and address the concerns it raises, which we outline below.

The Bill imperils encryption, a crucial tool for privacy and free expression; amplifies unchecked powers of the government to impose internet shutdowns; and enhances surveillance without independent oversight. The Bill in its current form poses a grave threat to fundamental rights, democracy, and the internet as we know it, and must be withdrawn and altered in order to remove these flaws.

We respectfully submit that:

  • The Bill authorises interception of messages and disclosure ‘in intelligible format’, without any exemption for encrypted platforms. An inalienable feature of end-to-end encrypted platforms is that no one other than the sender and intended recipient/s can access messages in any format, including the service provider. The Bill would threaten this foundational element that enables people to communicate freely and privately, in an environment of ever-increasing surveillance and cyberattacks, and potentially even resulting in such secure services choosing to not operate in India, to the detriment of all. It must be emphasised that any change to the architecture of such platforms to facilitate access would result in a vulnerability that can be exploited by a range of actors, enabling indiscriminate surveillance. Any notion suggesting that decryption/access abilities can be limited to select actors is wishful thinking. The inevitable ramification is weakening of online safety and cyber resilience overall, for individuals, businesses and governments. Additionally, in empowering the government to notify standards and conformity assessment measures on ‘encryption and data processing in telecommunication’ without any limitations, the Bill creates uncertainties around the ability of service providers to offer strong encryption, and develop privacy-respecting innovations. This will have an impact on both human rights in the digital age, as well as trust in digital services offered in the Indian market.
  • The Bill confers expansive surveillance and interception powers on the government, without meaningful independent and judicial oversight. Further, with requirements such as the one for telecommunication services to use ‘verifiable biometric based identification’, the Bill facilitates incursions on fundamental rights without any reasonable limitations and safeguards, against principles of necessity and proportionality. Even if inadvertently, the Bill reinforces the colonial-era mandates of the archaic laws that it seeks to replace, by establishing a system that prioritises centralised government powers over individual rights and democratic principles.
  • India has witnessed the highest number of internet shutdowns for five years in a row. Instead of reforming the framework to prevent disruption of connectivity and consequent harms to rights and freedoms, the Bill entrenches existing powers to suspend telecommunication services, devoid of checks and balances. Internet shutdowns are inherently disproportionate and must not be perpetuated. As a former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights explained, ‘[w]hen a state shuts down the internet, both people and economies suffer. The costs to jobs, education, health and political participation virtually always exceed any hoped-for benefit.’

Given the immeasurable impact of the Bill on fundamental rights, the economy, and India’s growing leadership in the digital space, it is alarming that the current version of the Bill has been introduced in parliament without any public consultation. The new draft fails to modify provisions that were criticised in the earlier draft and introduces new ones that deepen the damage. We respectfully call on the government to withdraw the Telecommunications Bill, 2023, and initiate inclusive, sustained consultation on the new draft, to incorporate rights-respecting amendments to protect encryption, privacy and security, and unimpeded access to an open, secure, and free internet. Without substantive amendments, India will have failed to take the opportunity to showcase leadership among democracies in the digital age that the overhaul of the telecommunication framework presents.



  • Access Now
  • Africa Media and Information Technology Initiative (AfriMITI)
  • ARTICLE 19: Global Campaign for Free Expression
  • Article 21 Trust
  • Association for Progressive Communications
  • Avocats Sans Frontières France
  • Betapersei
  • Bloggers of Zambia
  • Center for Democracy & Technology (Global Encryption Coalition Steering Committee)
  • Centre for Internet and Society (CIS)
  • Centre for Law and Democracy
  • Common Cause Zambia
  • Computech Institute
  • Derechos Digitales – América Latina
  • Digipub News India Foundation
  • Digital Empowerment Foundation
  • Digital Rights Watch
  • Ekō
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation
  • Fight for the Future
  • Freedom House
  • Front Line Defenders
  • Give1Project Gambia
  • Global Partners Digital (Global Encryption Coalition Steering Committee)
  • Global Witness
  • Indic Project
  • International Press Institute (IPI)
  • Internet Governance Project, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Internet Freedom Foundation
  • Internet Society
  • Internet Society UK England Chapter
  • Last Mile4D
  • – Bahrain
  • Media Diversity Institute – Armenia
  • MediaNet International Centre for Journalism
  • Mozilla (Global Encryption Coalition Steering Committee)
  • New America’s Open Technology Institute
  • OONI (Open Observatory of Network Interference)
  • Open Net Korea
  • OPTF / Session
  • PEN America
  • Polis Project
  • Privacy & Access Council of Canada
  • Proton
  • Signal Foundation
  • Southeast Asia Freedom of Expression Network (SAFEnet)
  • Superbloom
  • Swathanthra Malayalam Computing
  • Tech for Good Asia
  • The Tor Project
  • Tuta
  • Ubunteam
  • Voices for Interactive Choices and Empowerment (VOICE)
  • Wakoma
  • Webfala Digital Skills for all Initiative
  • Zaina Foundation
  • Zambian Bloggers Network


  • Anivar A Aravind, Public Interests Technologist
  • Angela Uzoma-Iwuchukwu, Digital Rights Advocate
  • Adeboye Adegoke, Digital Rights Advocate
  • Divyank Katira, Centre for Internet and Society
  • Gurshabad Grover, Technologist and Legal Researcher
  • Hija Kamran, Digital Rights Advocate
  • Nikhil Pahwa, Founder, MediaNama
  • Yusif Amadu, University of Ghana/ISOC GHANA