UNHRC: Significant resolution reaffirming human rights online adopted
01 Jul 2016
ARTICLE 19 welcomes the adoption at the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) of a significant resolution on “the promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet” (A/HRC/32/L.20). Attempts to weaken the resolution, led by Russia and China, were resoundingly rejected. More than 70 states supported the resolution as cosponsors.
“The resolution is a much-needed response to increased pressure on freedom of expression online in all parts of the world”, said Thomas Hughes, Executive Director of ARTICLE 19. “From impunity for the killings of bloggers to laws criminalising legitimate dissent on social media, basic human rights principles are being disregarded to impose greater controls over the information we see and share online,” he added.
“Governments must now act on the international commitments in this resolution to protect freedom of expression and other human rights online, at all times,” said Hughes.
More than 80 civil society organisations joined ARTICLE 19 in calling for the adoption of a strong resolution by consensus.
The resolution on “the promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet” (A/HRC/32/L.20) is the joint initiative of Brazil, Nigeria, Sweden, Tunisia, Turkey, and the United States of America.
The resolution reaffirms that “the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online”. This fundamental principle was the basis of two previous HRC resolutions, also adopted by consensus (A/HRC/res/26/13, June 2014; A/HRC/res/20/8, June 2012).
The resolution is a significant political commitment by states, based on their existing obligations under international human rights law, to:
- Address security concerns on the Internet in accordance with their obligations to protect freedom of expression, privacy and other human rights online;
- Ensure accountability for all human rights violations and abuses committed against persons for exercising their human rights, including for extrajudicial killings and arbitrary detention. This encompasses ensuring the release of those imprisoned for legitimate exercise of their freedom of expression rights, and ensuring that any attack against bloggers or other Internet users is effectively investigated and perpetrators held to account.
- Desist and refrain from “measures to intentionally prevent or disrupt access to or dissemination of information online”. This includes measures to shut down the Internet or part of the Internet at any time, in particular at times where access to information is critical, such as during an election, or in the aftermath of a terrorist attack.
- Adopt a “human rights based approach” to provide and expand access to the Internet, with particular regard to addressing the gender digital divide, and to promote Internet access for persons with disabilities. The importance of civil society and technical community participation in related processes is also recognised.
The resolution also recognises that a global and open Internet is crucial to achieving the Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. It requests the High Commissioner to prepare a report on “ways to bridge the gender digital divide from a human rights perspective”, with input from states, relevant HRC special procedures, civil society, the technical community and industry. The report will be presented to the HRC in June 2017 at its 35th Session.
Though the resolution was adopted by consensus, it faced opposition from a minority of states.
Russian Federation and China led amendments to the resolution aimed to delete calls for states to adopt a “human rights based approach” for providing and expanding access to the Internet, and remove key references to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and language on freedom of expression from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
“We are disappointed that democracies like South Africa, Indonesia, and India voted in favour of these hostile amendments to weaken protections for freedom of expression online”, said Hughes. “A human rights based approach to providing and expanding Internet access, based on states’ existing international human rights obligations, is essential to achieving the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development, and no state should be seeking to slow this down,” Hughes added.
Though the resolution makes positive references to the reports of the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, it missed the opportunity to substantively address many human rights concerns the mandate has raised in recent years. This includes recommendations to states to strengthen anonymity and encryption, and on the relationship between state and private ICT actors in promoting and protecting free expression online.
“While the resolution articulates strong human rights standards, the global situation for freedom of expression online demands more specific and detailed commitment from states to address other priority issues,” said Thomas Hughes. “In future HRC resolutions, states must tackle these issues head-on, including abusive laws that target legitimate online dissent, government efforts to undermine anonymity and encryption, and attempts to exert undue pressure on private ICT actors to engage in censorship.”
Download the resolution as adopted (with oral revisions) here.
 States voting in favour of the amendment and against the resolution were: Bolivia, Burundi, China, Cuba, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, Vietnam; those states abstaining were: Algeria, Bangladesh, Congo, Cote D’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Mongolia, Namibia, Philippines, Togo.
 States voting in favour of the amendment and against the resolution were: Bangladesh, Bolivia, Burundi, China, Cuba, Congo, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, Vietnam; those states abstaining were: Algeria, Cote D’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Kyrgyzstan, Togo
Receive immediate or weekly updates on the right to freedom of expressionSubscribe
rt @c__cath: read why #ietf statuscode #451 can make a difference for the ...