Pakistan: Online Harms Rules use flawed definitions from UK’s Prevent programme

Pakistan: Online Harms Rules use flawed definitions from UK’s Prevent programme -

ARTICLE 19 has outlined how the Pakistan Government’s Online Harms Rules could violate freedom of expression

The Citizens Protection (against Online Harms) Rules 2020 (the Rules) would see the creation of a government agency that could order the removal or blocking of ‘extremist’ content online. However, the overbroad definition of ‘extremism’ means that this could include content that is critical of the government, for example questions about their response to a terrorist attack. 

It seems to be based on the UK’s Prevent programme’s flawed definition of extremism, which has been heavily criticised by both the UN Special Rapporteurs on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and association and on counterterrorism.

Regional Director, ARTICLE 19 Bangladesh & South Asia, Faruq Faisel said:

“The Rules give powers of censorship to a government agency. But it should be the courts, not governments agencies, that decide whether content is unlawful – particularly when it comes to political content.

“The Rules could compel social media companies to spy on their users and remove content based on a flawed definition of extremism. 

“Freedom of expression in Pakistan is under threat unless they are withdrawn.”

Other ways that the Rules threaten freedom of expression are:

  • Companies could be required to mark content as ‘false’ at the request of the Government.
  • Website blocking is a blunt tool, which can often lead to more than the content that has been identified being blocked. 
  • Social media companies would only have 24 hours, or 6 hours in an emergency, to remove content. This makes it likely that companies will simply remove content rather than appealing.
  • Social media companies could be encouraged to use automated filters that would surveill the content of all users.

The Rules were published on 21 January 2020, in the Official Gazette, and an official consultation then took place. They seek to implement various sections in the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-Organisation) Act 1996 and the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016. 

ARTICLE 19 is calling for the Pakistani Government to withdraw the Rules and review its legislation on digital technologies so that they are in line with international human rights law.

Read ARTICLE 19’s full analysis.

For more information, contact [email protected]

 

Font Resize
Contrast