Estonia: Prosecution of Dmitry Linter and Three Others Statement to Harju county court arguing for the acquittal of the four defendants charged with inciting riots.

Statement concerning the case of Aleksanders Gilmans, who is set to go on trial for ‘incitement to forcibly overthrow the government of the Republic of Latvia’. The statement sets out international standards on freedom of expression and national security and concludes that Gilmans should be acquitted.

Intervention in a case in Lithuania in which a mental hospital sued an NGO for defamation.

Written Comments submitted by ARTICLE 19 in the Kassabova case arguing against the application of a criminal defamation law.

Written comments submitted by ARTICLE 19 on defamation of public officals.

Amicus curiae brief submitted by ARTICLE 19 and Interights in the case of Incal v. Turkey arguing for the broad protection of political speech and narrow restrictions on hate speech.

Amicus curiae brief submitted by ARTICLE 19 and Interights to the European Court of Human Rights on blasphemy and film censorship.

Amicus curiae brief by ARTICLE 19 and Interrights in the European Court of Human Rights concerning the right of journalists to protect their sources.

Written comments submitted by ARTICLE 19 and Interights to the European Court of Human Rights, outlining comparative law in the area of defamation of members of the judiciary.

Amicus curiae brief submitted by ARTICLE 19 and Interights to the European Court of Human Rights arguing against the use of criminal sanctions for blasphemy or insult to religion.

Amicus curiae brief submitted by ARTICLE 19 and Interights to the European Court of Human Rights, arguing that a State broadcasting monopoly breaches the right to freedom of expression.

Written comments submitted by ARTICLE 19 to the European Court of Human Rights on prior restraint and national security.